Shoe thrower hates both US, Iran role

December 16th, 2008

Here’s one view of Muntadhar al-Zeidi, the show throwing journalist now facing charges in Iraq. What does it say about the so called ‘successful surge’ (and isn’t than an offensive euphemism?) when normal working journalist are so caught up by events that they apparently snap. If this is at all representative of the mood of the ‘moderates’ in the country, then the trajectory of Iraq is not towards stability, as posited by the mouthpieces of the occupying forces, but towards perhaps even more fundamental change.

Family: Shoe thrower hates both US, Iran role

“He hates the American physical occupation as much as he hates the Iranian moral occupation”

Safe Harbor — not so much?

December 12th, 2008

I found a reference to a recent study by Galexia, an Australian consultancy, in Murray Long’s excellent Privacy Scan newsletter.

Cutting to the chase, the study finds that only 348 of 1,597 registered organizations complied with the basic requirements of the act. The study’s recommendations start with this paragraph:

“This study has found that there has been little improvement in either compliance or data quality since the negative 2002 and 2004 EU reviews of the Safe Harbor. Indeed, the growing number of false claims made by organisations regarding the Safe Harbor represent a new and significant privacy risk to consumers.

If the Safe Harbor is to operate effectively, an immediate program of improvements is required.”

This, it seems to me, is a much bigger risk than the Patriot Act boogey man so frequently brought out. The full text of the study can be found at http://www.galexia.com/public/research/assets/safe_harbor_fact_or_fiction_2008/safe_harbor_fact_or_fiction.pdf

Border Biometrics: “Zero Benefit”?

December 12th, 2008

Border Biometrics: “Zero Benefit”? – The Technology Liberation Front

Good summary: “We’re doing ourselves more harm than we’re preventing with border biometrics…”

Also worth noting is the comment that “terrorists are fungible”.

Criminals infiltrating Canada’s airports

December 11th, 2008

Criminals infiltrating Canada’s airports: RCMP
A national RCMP inquiry has concluded that all of Canada’s major airports have been infiltrated by organized crime.

This has to be right up there with a headline like, “Member of Overeaters Anonymous found working in food services” Geez Louise, OF COURSE organized crime is seeking to be embedded in airports – that’s the sensible place to be to bring contraband in and out. It might be easier to deal with this if we hadn’t put so much money into the essentially useless passenger screening and no-fly lists. Those exercises are political security theatre, instead of real measures.

Schneier on Security: Audit

December 11th, 2008

The following is alway worth repeating. According to Schneier on Security: Audit,

“For computerized database systems like that — systems entrusted with other people’s information — audit is a very important security mechanism. Hospitals need to keep databases of very personal health information, and doctors and nurses need to be able to access that information quickly and easily. A good audit record of who accessed what when is the best way to ensure that those trusted with our medical information don’t abuse that trust. It’s the same with IRS records, credit reports, police databases, telephone records – anything personal that someone might want to peek at during the course of his job.”

2008 to be extended by one second

December 9th, 2008

2008 to be extended by one second – space – 09 December 2008 – New Scientist

Start the party in Times Square one second later.

Md. Court Weighs Internet Anonymity – washingtonpost.com

December 9th, 2008

Md. Court Weighs Internet Anonymity – washingtonpost.com

My two cents, separate from any particular legislative requirement, is that on-line anonymity is:

  • Critical to the ability of people to make political commentary and say things about their government. It is on a par with the secret ballot in this arena.
  • Desirable (and immune from the kind of suit in the link above) for people making comments about corporate entities either as employees or customers. Bad restaurant reviews are a good thing, and anonymity prevents SLAPP suits.
  • Faint-hearted (but not something that should be prohibited) in inter personal communications such as bulletin boards or forums. I would escalate faint-hearted to cowardly when the attack is ad-hominem, scurrilous, or otherwise despicable as so many of the flame wars are.

When Linux fails

December 9th, 2008

Here’s an interesting take on why free (as in speech) software might be being resisted in organizations. I’ve found similar resistance to business improvements. When a person’s work experience is all about managing emergencies because processes don’t work, and they have to deal with upset customers or managers all the time, they start to derive their sense of value at work from coping with problems, not from being able to head off the problems before they occur. If that’s where your business is at, you’re in trouble.

When Linux fails | Between the Lines | ZDNet.com
It’s amazing to see the myth that Linux is hard to use, install, and support still being propagated in much of the media here in the U.S., when in reality it is resented by Windows administrators due to its ease of use and lesser requirements for professional support.

Wordle view

December 6th, 2008
This blog, rendered by http://www.wordle.net

This blog, rendered by http://www.wordle.net

Fanning the fires of national disunity

December 5th, 2008

globeandmail.com: Fanning the fires of national disunity
According to the Globe “…we have a power-hungry man who will be recorded as the first prime minister in Canada’s history to deliberately create a political crisis and set the fire of national disunity.”

In case it wasn’t clear from the types of links that I’ve posted about this lately, I’m incensed about what Harper has done. Not because I disagree with his politics, although I surely do, but because this is yet another in the long line of attempts that he has made to restructure the Canadian state – and not in a healthy way. He acts and speaks as if he truly does not understand the nature and history of parliamentary democracy. Harper has consistently worked to centralize power in the hands of the Prime Minister and to keep anything meaningful out of the hands not just of parliament – our actually elected members – but even from his own cabinet. The PMO, in this formulation acts as a kind of appointed politburo acting on the whims of the man at the centre.

Enough is enough. This man, with ambitions to be the President for Life of the Oil Republic of Canada, should no longer be the Prime Minister of Canada. Coalition or not, his own party should take him out behind the wood shed and come back without him.