Comments for Webistemology http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog Are you sure? Sat, 06 Dec 2008 02:06:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Fanning the fires of national disunity by jm http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/2008/12/05/fanning-the-fires-of-national-disunity/comment-page-1/#comment-26 jm Sat, 06 Dec 2008 02:06:11 +0000 http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/?p=111#comment-26 I agree wholeheartedly. This .wav file from the origina. Star Trek, spoken by McCoy, says it all: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Orion/3775/hisbrain.wav I agree wholeheartedly. This .wav file from the origina. Star Trek, spoken by McCoy, says it all: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Orion/3775/hisbrain.wav

]]> Comment on Not just useless! by Webistemology » Blog Archive » Terrorist Recognition Handbook http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/2008/03/27/not-just-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Webistemology » Blog Archive » Terrorist Recognition Handbook Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:43:43 +0000 http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/?p=57#comment-22 [...] Includes an appendix of household items that can be used to make improvised explosives.See my prior post about TSA vigilance. I wonder what chapter explains how to turn a MacBook Air into an [...] [...] Includes an appendix of household items that can be used to make improvised explosives.See my prior post about TSA vigilance. I wonder what chapter explains how to turn a MacBook Air into an [...]

]]> Comment on Leading surveillance societies in the EU and the World 2007 by PG http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/2007/12/31/leading-surveillance-societies-in-the-eu-and-the-world-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-6 PG Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:01:48 +0000 http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/?p=37#comment-6 The significant thing about the Privacy International assessment is that Canada, which in 2006 was described by PI as a country with “significant protections and safeguards” has slipped to the status of having “some safeguards but weakened protections.” Our privacy protections are described as "decaying." So while we are comparatively better than say the US or China, we are comparatively worse off than we were a year ago. The significant thing about the Privacy International assessment is that Canada, which in 2006 was described by PI as a country with “significant protections and safeguards” has slipped to the status of having “some safeguards but weakened protections.” Our privacy protections are described as “decaying.”

So while we are comparatively better than say the US or China, we are comparatively worse off than we were a year ago.

]]> Comment on The Statesman and Paris Hilton by jm http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/2007/09/14/the-statesman-and-paris-hilton/comment-page-1/#comment-4 jm Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:41:32 +0000 http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/?p=16#comment-4 Yes, but (this is the colleague speaking) I decided in consultation with the blog owner in question that web searchers fooled in this way would never return so what would be the point? Yes, but (this is the colleague speaking) I decided in consultation with the blog owner in question that web searchers fooled in this way would never return so what would be the point?

]]> Comment on The Statesman and Paris Hilton by John http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/2007/09/14/the-statesman-and-paris-hilton/comment-page-1/#comment-3 John Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:44:41 +0000 http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/?p=16#comment-3 The funny thing is that the tracking stats did spike after that post (from 10 hits to 25). I jokingly told a co-worker that one should refer to Google Trends to see each day's top hits, and figure out way to ensure that that at least three of the top ten search terms are included in the title and body of the post. Fame and fortune awaits! The funny thing is that the tracking stats did spike after that post (from 10 hits to 25). I jokingly told a co-worker that one should refer to Google Trends to see each day’s top hits, and figure out way to ensure that that at least three of the top ten search terms are included in the title and body of the post.

Fame and fortune awaits!

]]> Comment on The Statesman and Paris Hilton by PG http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/2007/09/14/the-statesman-and-paris-hilton/comment-page-1/#comment-2 PG Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:39:59 +0000 http://www.wunderlich.ca/blog/?p=16#comment-2 John, if you think you are off the hook because you can publicly self-criticize for blatantly riding the coat-tails of said famous personage to boost your hits, we're on to you -- all three of us who read your blog -- four, if we count my dog! :-) John, if you think you are off the hook because you can publicly self-criticize for blatantly riding the coat-tails of said famous personage to boost your hits, we’re on to you — all three of us who read your blog — four, if we count my dog!

:-)

]]>